|
The most exciting thing
about impact evaluation is when people realise that the results of the
evaluation will not only help secure an award or two, they will probably
help secure future budget or maybe even jobs.
Any investment decisions in 2009 are more
likely than ever to require evidence of prudent spending, real
innovation (not imitation) and value for money. These are also common
themes in awards judging criteria and where our experience is proving of
increasing value to our clients.
If you have just completed, or are about to
embark on, a new strategy or major project, then we can help: We have
reviewed the impact of over one hundred projects and strategies and have a
plethora of evaluation techniques that we would be delighted to
implement to help you measure the success of your initiative.
|
|
|
Multiple perspectives
|
Most projects are easy to evaluate from one
perspective but a proper evaluation should explore multiple stakeholder
perspectives. For example:
-
A corporate social responsibility initiative
might deliver clear benefits to the community and/or the
environment but if you cannot prove a positive business return, then
the initiative is not sustainable in every sense.
-
A sales training programme
is likely to have increased sales but unless you can prove that the new
practices are not annoying customers, then your evaluation might fail
to report a ticking
time bomb of alienated customers.
-
Investing in improved customer
service is too often shunned as a nice-to-have drain on profits,
partly because improvement initiatives focus on narrow customer
satisfaction scores. What if you could show a positive net impact on
profit? Then next year's budget would be as good as guaranteed.
-
Investing in staff development clearly
improves skills levels, and you might even be able to prove that
behaviours have changed, but unless you can make the link between
these skills improvements and strategic organisational objectives,
then these outcomes are meaningless and unlikely to secure future
funding.
For this reason all our evaluations explore
multiple perspectives.
Multiple levels
Low level evaluation involves measuring
first impressions. High level evaluation involves assessing strategic
impact on the business goals and the needs of its stakeholders, and
there are a host of levels in between the two.
A good evaluation covers as many levels as
possible, and goes as high as possible. Single levels can be skipped,
but if you go straight from low level to high level then any board
member or awards judge will be required to make a difficult leap of
faith, that we cannot guarantee they will agree with.
High level evaluation often takes clients
out of their comfort zone, but invariably results in tremendous pride
when they see the fruits of their labour this way.
How we can help
To find out more
please contact us.
See also
|